🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, approves a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Strong Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision comes amid a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Usually, redistricting happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

A top House figure stated the court had yet again shredded its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.