🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.