🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish other types of wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.